For me, it's not the ugliness. I simply fail to understand what, exactly, GNOME or KDE are supposed to actually do for me. I use Window Maker with a few icons on the desktop to launch frequently-used programs, and I can switch virtual desktops via +<1>, +<2>, ..., +<0>. I've installed Helix GNOME, and it is cool (the Star Trek(R) door-like psssst sound when you hide/unhide the panel is groovy), but at the end of the day, what does GNOME actually *DO* for me, other than burn cycles on my CPU? D * On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 09:43:52PM -0500, jkenner@mindspring.com wrote: > fvwm > > No, not fvwm2/fvwm95 .. just fvwm. > > I havent seen anything (yet) in any of the shiny window managers that has convinced me I need to change, but I am still playing with the RH 6.2 install I just did yesterday. xv just looks UGLY with a giant KDE window wrapped around it. :-) > > I much prefer the 2 pixel wire-frame look I set up ages ago with fvwm.. > > plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us wrote: > > I'm not tracking it down. I'm sick and tired of constantly trying to track > stupid problems like this one down. If I had a dime for every time I tried > to install a piece of software, whether it be freshmeat or the KDE or just > trying to listen to a CD, I could have bought a licensed version of Win2k > and a compatible computer to run it on by now. > > > ________________________________________________ > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail. > > Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >