--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:55:28AM -0700, Kurt Granroth wrote:
> On Monday 06 August 2001 11:39 am, Thomas Mondoshawan Tate wrote:
> > Mm... Good points. I hadn't thought about it with regards to bandwidth
> > issues, etc. Perhaps then just a simple script running on a webserver t=
hat
> > sends an e-mail to postmaster@infected.ip.that.hit? Or would that be
> > considered unsolicited e-mail/SPAM?
>=20
> Keep in mind that in the case of Code Red (and *most* worms), the infecte=
d=20
> host is running Windows.  How many windows boxes do you know that have a =
mail=20
> server correctly setup and running so that 'postmaster@ip' would even wor=
k :-)

Well, not many home users, but what about the large commercial sites out th=
ere?
I'd think they'd at least have webmaster@wherever setup. Besides isn't
postmaster@wherever an RFC requirement?

-- Mondoshawan

> --=20
> Kurt Granroth            | http://www.granroth.org
> KDE Developer/Evangelist | SuSE Labs Open Source Developer
> granroth@kde.org         | granroth@suse.com
>             KDE -- Conquer Your Desktop
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't p=
ost to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>=20
> PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7bu1zYp5mUsPGjjwRAjDrAKCjfrWQ//z2XpT4c7G8qgtlRr1XPgCeMoUM
F0LZowN5fFjPqOOV5WjR5hc=
=wJjH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--