--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hrmf... Guess I'm just too lacking in the versions of commercial distros -- only copies of RH and Slack I have are versions 6.2 and 7.0 respectively. (not really interested in those distros -- an LFS system is all I need. =3D= o) As for the non-existant 2.5 series: why does it trouble you? --=20 Thomas "Mondoshawan" Tate phoenix@psy.ed.asu.edu http://tank.dyndns.org/presence On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 05:35:43PM -0700, Jim wrote: > All of the new distros come with 2.4. I think it has gotten to the point= of=20 > being nice and stable. What troubles me is that we havent seen a 2.5 ser= ies=20 > yet. > > On Thursday 16 August 2001 16:58, you wrote: > > Anybody notice the abundance of people holding on and still patching the > > older 2.2 kernels? I've been rather curious about this for a while -- > > didn't say much about it because I thought it was a fluke or something. > > Isn't the existance of the 2.4 kernels saying that the experimental 2.3 > > kernels have reached a stable version? >=20 > ---------------------------------------- > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset=3D"us-ascii";=20 > name=3D"Attachment: 1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Description:=20 > ---------------------------------------- > ________________________________________________ > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't p= ost to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail. >=20 > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7fI16Yp5mUsPGjjwRAv4VAKCzNifjhguLZ/iyN/daIyugFSbBvQCdGieM rYF9ANoICHbjRSP4L/Osatw= =R7T8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--