Craig White wrote: > and btw - no fair bragging about your young eyes, 1600 x 1200 on a 19" > monitor is too small for the 45+ crowd. What can I say, I come from the > land where 72 dpi is the screen resolution - not 96 dpi. Hell, I run 1600x1200 on my 17 inch (16.0 viewable) on occassion, but the 55Hz refresh is a little harsh. I generally prefer 1440x1080x62 - the key is to NOT use 60Hz, EVER EVER EVER, cause thats the frequency room lights blink at! I think its funny that I can read the display from 5 feet away when people with supposedly 20/20 vision have trouble reading it at half that distance. My father had the same thing w/ his eyes as well, only even more so. Except he is colorblind as well, which sorta takes away the keenness of high-res vision. -- jkenner @ mindspring . com__ I Support Linux: _> _ _ |_ _ _ _| Working Together To <__(_||_)| )| `(_|(_)(_| To Build A Better Future. |