No, I should have noted that more common lower level ports are blocked than were. I know that 21, 25 and 80 are blocked. I'm not certain about others. -----Original Message----- From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.mybutt.net [mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.mybutt.net]On Behalf Of Gontran Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 12:56 PM To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.mybutt.net Subject: Re: Cox.net - directed to Mr. Pyne primarily * Adrian Mink (adrian@minkland.com) wrote: > That's what I had been doing previously. Cox@home only blocked 80 to me so I > was able to run ftp and mail out of my house on my RH box. Now they are > blocking all lower level ports. What a pain. > Really? That's quite interesting. When you say 'all lower level', do you mean >=1024 or do you mean only say 25 and 23? Curious, Gontran ________________________________________________ See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail. PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.mybutt.net http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss