No, I should have noted that more common lower level ports are blocked than
were. I know that 21, 25 and 80 are blocked. I'm not certain about others.

-----Original Message-----
From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.mybutt.net
[mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.mybutt.net]On Behalf Of Gontran
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 12:56 PM
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.mybutt.net
Subject: Re: Cox.net - directed to Mr. Pyne primarily


* Adrian Mink (adrian@minkland.com) wrote:
> That's what I had been doing previously. Cox@home only blocked 80 to me so
I
> was able to run ftp and mail out of my house on my RH box. Now they are
> blocking all lower level ports. What a pain.
>
Really?   That's quite interesting.  When you say 'all lower level', do
you mean >=1024 or do you mean only say 25 and 23?

Curious,
Gontran
________________________________________________
See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post
to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.

PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.mybutt.net
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss