On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 15:07, Blake Barnett wrote: > On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 10:29, Victor Odhner wrote: > > > > > But how does the common-library-version-compatibility issue > > play out in the Linux world? I'd be interested in hearing > > comments on this, because I haven't done a lot of updating > > under Linux. Seems to me that doing an apt-get to install > > one application, with its required libraries, might cause > > a library to become incompatible with another application > > already resident on the machine. > > That's what APT is. It checks all those dependancies between what is > installed, and what is going to be installed, downloads only what you > need to fulfill those dependancies and simplifies your life. It's very > configurable and you can do quite a few other things with it, but that > is the gist. > > In short, the problem you describe, is one that APT was designed to > eliminate. > --- yeah but... where is Evolution 1.01 in deb sources? in unstable if it is available at all - I would bet. Craig