Mozilla is extremely friendly, particularly the
tabs to switch between source, preview, etc.
Produces great source as WYSIWIGs go, but I'm
still too anal to put it on a public machine
before I clean it.

If you do any significant volume, I'd have to
agree with the opinion that hand coding is going
to be most efficient. Once it becomes a natural
language it's faster to not use the mouse if you
have a powerful, extensible editor. But if (like
me) you only do a few pages a month, a WYSIWIG
may help.

I haven't tried Quanta.

On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Greg Furmanek wrote:

> I have tried a lot of wysiwyg editors and I have to say that coding by
> hand beats it all
>
> Greg
>
> Bryce C. wrote:
>
> >Could anyone reccomend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor for linux?  I really
> >hate having to type out table html by hand.
> >
> >Bryce C.
> >Network Administrator
> >CoBryce Communications
> >Bryce @ BryceCo . Net
> >
> >
> >
> >________________________________________________
> >See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> >
> >PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> >http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------
  "What can Americans do to stay safe after these attacks?"
  "Buckle your seat-belt and quit smoking."
-------------------------------------------------------------------