-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 10 July 2002 18:36, der.hans wrote: > The real question, though, is: do you really need ftp? Use http for anon > downloading and ssh/scp/sftp for authorized uploading/downloading if you > can. Isn't there a larger overhead for http downloads (i.e. slower downloads)? Don't http connections also have to come down the line in order? I know that http is easier for the user to work with, but what kind of performance penalty will you see for using it? Just a curious mind. ;-) - -- Voltage Spike ,,, (. .) - --ooO-(_)-Ooo-- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9LQGppNoctRtUIRQRAlD3AJ4hogFd1CUXToqHgqtAj9M7B9RAjQCfQW0v kOxvJEOB/UETlyjixTl3alI= =a1/t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----