Am 21. Jan, 2003 schw=E4tzte David Huerta so:

> No offense intended, but this just sounds like some elements in the Green
> party are simply seeing Linux as something to make them a little more
> h4rdc0r3 2 th4 m4x.  Not that I don't support the move, but is there any
> practical reason for it?  I do web design myself, and I can say that it
> will be hard for someone used to M$ Frontpage or Dreamweaver to start
> coding in VI or Emacs.

Give 'em bluefish. The only thing that makes less maintainable html than
frontpage is m$ office apps.

Cool, "En Espa<ol" :)

They're currently using "Edit Revolution 2 (www.snowblind.net)", which
appears to be 'the' HTML editor for DOS. Whereas Frontpage is the HTML
editor for DoS ;-).

Also whatever the webmaster uses on her computer is her problem. Upload via
ftp over ssl, ssh, sftp or webdav.

ciao,

der.hans
--=20
#  https://www.LuftHans.com/    http://www.TOLISGroup.com/
#  kill telnet, long live ssh - der.hans