--=-gIcn+hJ0cJLblsaMrwlg
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 12:24, Randy Melder wrote:
> They are probably "sand-bagging" for what would have been a
> lower-than-expected earnings quarter.

I believe it was on an SEC filing that they reported this threat.  I see
it as two fold.

1. They are sand bagging for not being able to meet estimates.
2. They are trying to prove they are not a 'monopoly'.  If someone is
'hurting' their profits there must be competition.

--=20
Derek Neighbors
GNU Enterprise
http://www.gnuenterprise.org
derek@gnue.org

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=3Ddneighbo

--=-gIcn+hJ0cJLblsaMrwlg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+T+nfHb99+vQX/88RAuUtAJ4+pi9uEulH1r78VC4T3jWy+Gyr0QCfZ6nE
Nop1uRtwF2Nogji6SvR3rAg=
=4ms4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-gIcn+hJ0cJLblsaMrwlg--