--=-03q3B006rxCLpW30EoHm Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, I'll just say that I got Yellowdog 3.0, and it comes with fontconfig 2.1. For the most part, atleast on PPC, 2.1 sucks. I didn't realize how much until I upgraded. I've now upgraded to 2.2 and Nautilus doesn't crash, GDM doesn't crash, Dia 0.91 works, etc. I guess I could recompile every one of those... --Ted On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 21:30, Victor Odhner wrote: > (Was Re: a cool Opera feature that Mozilla doesn't have) >=20 > Lynn David Newton wrote: > > Why Galeon depends on an older version of Mozilla ... > > and can't run on its own I have no idea. >=20 > Ayyy, MEN, brother. >=20 > Bart Garst wrote: > > shared libraries. It makes sense to use code that > > already exists instead of "re-inventing the wheel" > > for every package. >=20 > Sorry Bart, but I'd say shared libraries make *no* sense. > Downloading a newer version of a library for a newer > program is not "re-inventing" anything. The efficiency > is in sharing the development of libraries, not storage. > Some programs should be allowed to be newer than others. > Or older, if necessary. >=20 > Nice programs don't break each other. Why can't they all > just get along, each with its own stuff? Forced sharing > is the same "efficiency" that gives us DLL Hell in the > Microsoft world. >=20 > We can do better, can't we? Fer gosh sakes, what's > $LD_LIBRARY_PATH good for, if it must be the same for > every application? This is a big advantage Unices have > over Windows, but we're not using it to full advantage. >=20 > Compulsory sharing is a major barrier to Linux acceptance > by users whose purpose for the system is something beyond > tinkering with the system. If you need a mixed bag of > tools, upgrading any of them risks mangling the whole > panoply. Each time you want a new and better tool, you're > forced to take that risk. It shouldn't be that way. >=20 > In this age of the cheap gigabyte, library sharing at the > application level is a secondary efficiency, and is only > efficient if it does no harm. Otherwise it's a damn waste > of our invaluable time and attention. It's a bottleneck, > like having one bathroom per floor in a hotel. >=20 > Every tool should install independently of every other > tool, bringing in new library versions as needed without > stepping on the older ones. The installer should have a > resource online to learn about newer library versions > that are backward compatible to the tool being installed, > in case they're already available on the system. But we > should plan on having a distinct set of libraries for > each app: It's a bonus if some sharing is possible. >=20 > My hobby is not Linux administration, and I don't have > the time it takes to install a new package on Linux > and glue together all the broken furniture afterwards. >=20 > Give me an installer that will free me from being a > "Linux geek" so I can be a "Perl geek" or just a user. > There are just so many hours in a lifetime. >=20 > KevinO wrote: > > urpme mozilla ... > > urpmi --auto --auto-select --update >=20 > Talk nice, Kevin. And oh yeah, a comprehensible > installer command language would also help. >=20 > Vic >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >=20 --=-03q3B006rxCLpW30EoHm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+1aiTLE335pRPGp0RAlNLAJwIgQfX5YPBIX2s5PLkWruNc3gkLwCfWqaB s1350a6eiU1OFrCKDB7WXZQ= =bNhx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-03q3B006rxCLpW30EoHm--