\_ SMTP quoth der.hans on 6/17/2003 16:15 as having spake thusly:
\_
\_ Am 17. Jun, 2003 schw,bd(Btzte Kurt Granroth so:
\_ 
\_ > Far from ludicrous, I think this is a great idea.  Their explanation is
\_ > dead-on for why something like this is necessary.  This should cut down on
\_ > outgoing SPAM and virii quite a bit.
\_ 
\_ Do their smtp servers require email addresses to be *@cox.net or whatever
\_ they give out?

Their faq says vanity emails supported so long as it resolves.

I haven't tested.

David