This one is blocked too.

der.hans wrote:

>Am 17. Jun, 2003 schwätzte Mike Starke so:
>
>  
>
>>What I see more benefit from is having them open
>>25 going the other way! I had loads of uses for that ability
>>until they shut me down....I am able to skirt the port 80 issue
>>by running on something higher, but can not find a similar solution
>>for smtp (e.g run mail on a higher port?).
>>    
>>
>
>Try using SSMTP, SMTP over SSL. It's port 465 and I've never heard of it
>being blocked. I think all the main SMTP daemons support it.
>
>Haven't actually tried it myself, but more and more mail servers are adding
>support.
>
>Once you have that working get someone who has port 25 available to be an MX
>for you and they can forward mail from servers that don't support SSMTP :).
>
>ciao,
>
>der.hans
>  
>

-- 
"Anger and Greed are the primary causes of defeat"
		Sun Tzu - "Art of War"