It's been a long time since I looked at Shared Source, but here is what I
recall....


> * Microsoft owns the source code and any changes you make to it.

My understanding is you can only "view" not modify.  So there is nothing
of yours for M$ to own.

>    - You can't change the software to include company secrets.  The
>      GPL allows you to redistribute the changed binary within the
>      company without releasing the source code.

My understanding is you can't change the software at all.

>    - I don't think you can give your changes to other organizations.
>      If another company is having the same problems, could you help
> point them in the right direction at least?

You could point them in the right direction as to the cause of their
problem assuming it didn't violate your non-disclosure signed with
Microsoft.  However, you are not allowed (iirc) to change anything so you
certainly could share a "patch".

> * What happens if Microsoft goes out of business?  Does the source
>   code become free range or would the rights be transferred to another
> company?

Depends on how contracts are structured.  I suppose some companies have
been able to get escrow deals with M$, where by M$ closes its doors its
source becomes available to those that have paid.

> * How much does it cost to purchase viewing rights to the code?  Does
>   Microsoft give away this right for free to larger customers?

It cost a butt load (technical term).  Only the largest customers or those
with security concerns above the norm (foreign/local governments) have
been offerred "Shared Source" deals.

Please note one of the most evil things about Shared Source is the
non-disclosure stuff you have to sign.  Basically it all but ruins your
career of working on anything but M$ stuff for the rest of your life just
to be able to 'view' the source code.

If my facts are wrong please correct.  As stated it's been sometime since
I reviewed Shared Source.

-Derek