technomage wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Saturday 02 August 2003 02:05 pm, der.hans wrote:
> 
>>moin, moin,
>>
>>proprietary software vendors have claimed their products are more secure
>>than Free Software because there's no source code to examine. They claim
>>this means bad guys have to develop the exploit rather than just find an
>>error. This is a process that supposedly takes longer and is harder to do.
>>
> 
> 
>>Now add in tools like BugScan, http://www.bugscaninc.com/, and any claims
>>of security through obscurity by proprietary vendors just don't hold water.
> 
> the above mentioned webpage doesn't appear to exist (I got timeouts and bad 
> hostname errors trying to access it).
> 
> Mage
> 
> - -- 
> I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or 
> numbered!
> My life is my own - No. 6
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE/LEDOn/usgigAaLcRAsACAJ4/3O6NX2LT3NM7uMmQ/JS6I86uhACfRWfY
> FwefheyD16zlVbdT/+SEmU0=
> =7zcL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
As did I.

-- 
                                   .-.
=------------------------------   /v\  ----------------------------=
Robert Wultsch                   // \\        robert.wultsch@asu.edu
Linux User                      /(   )\              AIM:sheepsleep7
Don't fear the penguins          ^^-^^                  (602)6927564