So far I've only heard it reported that *one* company has paid. After haring the discription and the fact that the company does not want to be named. I'm certain that MicroSoft is the company. On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 00:03, MCR wrote: > I kind of found it unnerving to find out that some > companies are paying for the liscense. It seems > atleast they should wait to see what happens with the > law suit. This makes me feel like they are even more > of an extorionist. Once the SCO gets smashed by this > lawsuit I sure that company turns around and sue's SCO > for their liscense fee back. > > mike > > --- Entelin wrote: > > We really need to do something, like a protest or > > something. Mabe get > > some other lug's together too, something to let the > > mass of people know > > we exist. We need to get the average person to > > recognise SCO as an > > extortionist. > > > > > http://www.suse.com/us/company/press/press_releases/archive03/sco_redhat.html > > http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/22014.html > > > > -- > > Entelin > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > PLUG-discuss mailing list - > > PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail > > settings: > > > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss -- Carl Parrish (cparrish@carlparrish.com) http://www.carlparrish.com --- Registered Linux User #295761 http://counter.li.org