--=-8Z4uICBdnksxGmVcg862
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Whatever happened to the push for bipartisanism that was so "important"
back in the '90s (oh that's scary)? I'm doing my part and using both.
Why don't you? :-P

On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 16:17, Derek Neighbors wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> Ted Gould wrote:
>=20
> |the color can help with.  A developer can just add the option, or they
> |can look at the source of the problem and make it 'just work' in those
> |situations.
>=20
> The problem is gnome doesn't just work.  The problem is they are
> trying to "idiot" proof it.  Opinions vary.  For example I like small
> clean fonts.  My co-worker likes large big fonts.  So how does a
> developer solve this?  Medium fonts?  Some things you just have to be
> able to configure.
>=20
> I have no problem with them going to the "just works" principle.  They
> should look at the KDE Control Center.  It "just works".
>=20
> |I think that if you talk to people who have switched from Linux to Mac
> |OS X, they've done it because Mac OS X 'just works'.  They don't have to
> |configure it.  You could argue that not allowing the user to change the
> |setting is treating them as stupid, or you could argue that it's letting
> |them do better things like they're job :)
>=20
> I agree.  Assuming that the defaults let them do their job.  In GNOME
> that wasn't the case.  It DIDN'T work.
> So I guess, all in all, I'd prefer to have my computer 'just work' than
>=20
> |If you'd write up what was happening with GConf and what things you were
> |having to change on the command line I'd be happy to forward it to the
> |development lists.
>=20
>=20
> Seriously if I had to write it up, it would take weeks.  I have
> submitted numerous bug reports.  Frankly the number one reason I
> switched.  I was sick of the developer attitudes around GNOME.  End of
> Story.  I was sick of the "we are the superior Gods if you don't like
> it F*** OFF".  I will take my business and donations to someone who
> doesn't have an attitude.  Hello KDE. :)  That is not a blanket
> statement, a lot of GNOME developers are good and I have relationships
> with.  I hope them the best.
>=20
> - -Derek
>=20
> |
> |        --Ted
> |
>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>=20
> iD8DBQE/SUePHb99+vQX/88RAtx+AJ9ljEOeVqH2vYFrjl5/KQfkA1R3MQCfd57U
> DYvN2exbyiUAfhh4jqa4KtE=3D
> =3DB/Sl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>=20
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
"Pascal is Pascal is Pascal is dog meat." -- M. Devine and P. Larson,
Computer Science 340

--=-8Z4uICBdnksxGmVcg862
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/SVId/wbq/C6yyPcRAmjaAKCA4YF5tHOVSJkzQOdOYOcV5jTn8QCfa3bi
zj67ym2MpHAtZ5KXdb5+fVA=
=qITf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-8Z4uICBdnksxGmVcg862--