On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 17:42, der.hans wrote:
> Am 07. Oct, 2003 schwätzte Alan Dayley so:
> 
> > lynx is correct, if what we are talking about is the text based web
> > browser.  BTW, lynx is not installed by the Red Hat Linux default
> > installer.  I believe it is on the CDs, though.  I don't know about the
> > other distros.  I always just download it when I need it.
> 
> links is also a text-based browser, but far more capable than lyxn and
> generally better. Last I used it for testing web devel it had probs with
> caching. Otherwise it rocks over lynx.
> 
> I'm in favor of installing both, actually :).
> 
----
IIRC - they had different capabilities when it came to handling frames
and ssl - I don't recall if links could do ssl at all.

Craig