On the issue of the firewall, try checking out "IPcop," I've been using version 0.1.1 for quite a while. It's forked off of Smoothwall, and doesn't have the limitations (or ads) that smoothwall has, However, I really haven't stayed current on the versions, My understanding is that they've released a couple of other versions, but they didn't seem to work right on my firewall box. Google for it or go to "http://www.ipcop.org" ShieldX On Wednesday 14 January 2004 08:55 am, you wrote: >I was planning on using Smoothwall to set up as a firewall router for a >clients' network - I had used it in the past with some success. I have >come to realize that their opensource release doesn't support multiple >external ip addresses and that is a requirement. > >Part of the functionality I am looking for is to permit some users to >work from home and Windows clients can use L2TP/IPSec to VPN into the >lan and spent some time examining the documentation for this on >Microsoft's web site. I could always use 1 or more of the WinXP >Professional Workstations to handle the VPN connections but these >machines would have to be on 24/7, are limited to 3 concurrent >connections (I may never exceed this, but if it's as popular as I think >it will be, I might need to exceed this) and then there's the whole >issue of logging and security that is most difficult to monitor. > >Thus, I am revisiting the entire option of firewall/router and FreeS/wan >and I am wondering: > >1 - Is there an open source package that includes support for >kernel/freeS/wan updates that I could use and still be able to dmz >multiple external ip addresses? > >2 - Is anyone currently doing this? Any recommendations? If I use say a >Red Hat distro, every time there is a kernel security errata (a little >too frequently these days), I would have to either rebuild the kernel or >rebuild the freeS/wan module - a PITA (makes a ClarkConnect system for >$125 look attractive). > >3 - Is there any web pages / info that can tell me how to use openssl to >create certificates which are acceptable to Windows 2000/XP clients that >I can give to remote clients to use to authenticate themselves with >freeS/wan or should I stay with PSK? > >Thanks, > >Craig > >--------------------------------------------------- >PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us >To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: >http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss