Perhaps this is not all bad, providing M$ uses the patent solely as the 2nd purpose. ;) Alan Dayley wrote: > It's not a hoax. However, it is probably one of the many, many patents > that are applied for, most of which that are granted, whose only purpose > is to lock the market on that idea. In this case, the optimist in me > hopes that no one, schools or otherwise, are dumb enough to accept such > a deal. And, I don't expect that MS expects to ever actually implement > such a system. But, if the market is ever accepting of this sort of > thing, they are now the monopoly holder and so the market is squashed. > > IMO, patents mostly have two purposes: > - The original purpose is to foster innovation by granting the inventor > a temporary monopoly to financially benefit from his idea. > - The secondary side effect purpose of restricting markets and > competition by holding patents but never actually implementing them in a > product. I lump patent holding companies in this group. > > Most unfortunately the latter, side effect use is by far the most > prevalent today. > > Alan > > jdawgaz@cox.net wrote: >> this IS a hoax, right? > > >> ---- "der.hans" wrote: >>> moin moin, >>> >>> http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37568 >>> >>> Ugh! > -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss