On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Craig White wrote: > freenx - don't look any further. > > I don't know what your 'server' is running but RHEL/CentOS has freenx > server available in CentOS Plus repository, Fedora has it available in > standard repositories and I would venture that any Debian installation > would have it packaged and ready to install. Yes, I figured that. Was already planning CentOS for this. > FreeNX does a number of things... > - encrypted SSL > - compression for excellent transmissions, even through congested > network space (i.e., Internet) > - can possibly use local printers/hard drive (I presume you can disable > this feature too) > - supports copy/paste from to/from host > > The client is downloaded free from 'nomachine.org' > > Nomachine.com also sells their NX Server which is probably better than > the FreeNX version but to be honest, FreeNX has always given me what I > need. > > I am concerned though that you are thinking that you can give a user a > shell on a system and prevent them from copying files to/from anywhere. > I don't think that is a reasonable expectation. I think if your > expectation is to really put limitations on a user, you should be using > something like LTSP (http://www.ltsp.org) Agreed that if a user can logon, they could do many things even if measures are there to prevent it. Most of these users are not tech-savvy and would not venture to a terminal window if it was already open for them. The tech-savvy ones will just have to follow policy, if the undesired applications can't be blocked. I had not considered LTSP but will go look at it. Thank you. Alan --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss