On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:15 AM, James Finstrom wrote: > I would say cheap thumb drives are a bad idea. I would also have an > alternitive. I have seen some of these low end thumb drives corrupt if you > breath on them. The secret thus far has been to write the data, verify then > write protect the device. We use thumb drives for Kickstarts and production > scripting, I have thrown away all the cheap thumb drives without write > protection and have replaced them with thumb drives with a write protect > switch. This has reduced the need to recreate corrupted drives. I would > recomend a thumbdrive and ftp backuo scheme. It is always good to backup off > site incase of fire or federal confiscation (just kidding) > James, I have been looking for thumbdrives with a physical write protect switch for some time unsuccessfully. Where do you get them and what brand(s)? I have one from Memorex but need more space. I use them to bring troubleshooting software to machines I service but whose status wrt viruses, etc. is unknown. Hence the need to use a true physical write protect method and not depend on a violable software write protect scheme. Thanks in advance, Larry Thiel -- Man is the only animal that laughs and weeps, for he is the only animal that is struck with the difference between what things are and what they ought to be. - William Hazlitt --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss