Matt Graham wrote: > From: Eric Shubert >> Has anyone here implemented any clusters? > > I've only set one up, but I maintain the ones that my predecessors > set up. It's not rocket science. > >> Is any particular distro better or worse at clustering? > > Not really. Every distro has heartbeat/DRBD/LVS available. > >> Any pointers regarding clustering you'd like to share? > > Define the problem you're trying to solve more rigorously than just > "clustering" first. Do you want flailover between 2 boxes? Do you > want a frontend box with N service-providing boxes behind it? The > answers to that greatly affect what you will end up doing, as does > the question "What services is this cluster going to provide?" > > Basically, all I can do is handwave without answers to "what services?" > and "how many machines?". > I'm talking about a supercomputer sort of thing. Not failover. Not redundancy. A group of machines (let's say 6 for example) acting as a single number crunching behemoth. Something that can deliver tens of teraflops. -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss