Dazed_75 wrote: > > That sounds like a possibility all right. TTBOMK though, FAT32 > has a 2G > > file size limit. :( > > > > Now that I think of it though, are we confusing partition vs file sizes? > The 'overlay' partition would be what's over 2G, not a file. From what > I've seen of overlay filesystems, there are still going to be > independent files within the partition. It's not just one big file. As > such, I doubt this is the problem. As always, I could be wrong. I think > I was on that last post (except for the 2G part!). > > -- > -Eric 'shubes' > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > > Actually, FAT32 is 4GB limit according to several sources. Which > explains how I was able to put a DVD .iso on a FAT32, but not a FAT16 > partition. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314463 > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc938937.aspx > > -- > Dazed_75 a.k.a. Larry > Thanks for correcting me, Larry. I don't know *where* I came up with that. Perhaps fat16 partition limit. That wikipedia link is very good. Kinda weird that the max file size is 4G on all 3 fat varieties, up to the partition size. So fat16 could handle a 4G file, except the partition can only be 2G. Go figure. -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss