Lol. Let us just say if I have to shut it down I am not going to be happy. Failover is both time consuming and risky and should not have to be done for something so trivial as a lazy app/os. On 11/4/10, R P Herrold wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Bryan O'Neal wrote: > >> Setting swapiness is how I can deal with a recurrence but it will not >> flush current swap. And I can not shut down any process to perform >> swap off. :( > > then you have not yet adequately provided for failover -- If a > process 'can not be shut down', it has not business being on > only one server without a failover capacity > > Solve the failover problem, and you both increase reliability > of the service, and make possible regular administration > > -- Russ herrold > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > -- Sent from my mobile device --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss