JT Moree wrote:
> 
> wouldn't happen to be port 465 (ESMTP)?
> 
> As someone else mentioned using a proxy might be a better way to do it.
>  If you know perl look at qpsmtpd.  It may be more than you need and
> probably won'd do exactly what you want but it uses plugins. Worst case
> you can write your own forward plugin that authenticates as it
> relays/sends mail.

Nope, not that port.

I have the port issue solved and am "happily" getting authentication
failures from the target server.  The information I have on how to
connect does not document the authentication method required, just that
authentication is required.  I have a question pending with the target
server people about that.

We'll see how it falls out tomorrow.

Alan