some lurkers might be reading it in the "archives" on the web -- e.g.,
they might
be reading it at

http://lists.plug.phoenix.az.us/lurker/message/20090611.131653.529c2f93.en.html
 [1]
HENCE (probably) the reason why kite pilot wanted to
provide a "clue" as to his contact info, in the body of the message.
((apparently, in a form intended to "NOT" be very useful to a robot...))

Oh, wait a minute.  I just noticed that, at that "archive" URL, (see [1]),
his entire e-mail address (in a form suitable to be useful even to a robot)
appears, right in the "Author:" header, of the message.
   Is this due to a RECENT CHANGE?  Didn't our "lurker" software have a
policy (as of some very recent time) to always mangle e-mail addresses,
to be less convenient for spambot harvesting?
    Hmmm...
I think what it usually does, is, put the "name" in the archived message,
but
in some cases, (like this one), where the "e-mail address" does not "come
with" any [other] name,  apparently it just defaults the "name" to be, the
same as the "e-mail address".
    I suspect that (if this is true) (or, if something 'close' to this is
true), then
kite pilot might not have realized this (and, the implications).
   Until now...
-- 
Mike Schwartz
Glendale  AZ
schwartz@acm.org

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Stephen <cryptworks@gmail.com> wrote:

> id honestly find it easier to look at the sender line... :-)
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:50 AM,
> kitepilot@kitepilot.com<kitepilot@kitepilot.com> wrote:
> > Has any programmer in this list written Java code using the Htmlunit
> > framework?
> > If you can lend me a hand, please contact me off list at:
> > k1tepil0t[AT]kitep1l0t(DOT)c0m
> > Make sure you replace the numbers above with letters!  :)
> > Tnx.
> > ET
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - [...]
> --
> Stephen
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [...]
>