And very interesting descriptive literary first person subjective
experience from Boneal.
Postgres is a very schitzophrenic (and insecure) solution, but very good in
clearly defined roles. Since you are clearly right brained Boneal, get one
of the graphic management tools, like pgmyadmin or psgsql.
Obnosis |
(503)754-4452
PLUG Linux
Security Labs 2nd Saturday Each Month@Noon - 3PM> From:
boneal@cornerstonehome.com
> To:
plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: RE: looking for db
recommendation
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:25:18 -0700
>
>
Perhaps I was unduly harsh on Postgresql.
>
> And while the last
time I messed with it was over a half decade past; it
> gave me a headache
at the time. I am told my headaches would have gone away
> if I just did
XYZ (which changed depending on who you talked to) like
> setting more
restrictive locks. The problem I had was that, to me, things
> like
manually setting the locking mode to eliminate intermittent errors of
>
old data being returned by queries after newdata was committed by other
>
queries is just not intuitive. I would understand releasing these locks
and
> accepting the risk if I needed to resolve some odd conflict
immediately
> while working on a real solution, but the other way around?
PostgreSQL just
> felt like a slightly schizophrenic overly needy
girlfriend, I suppose if I
> understood her better I would love her but I
was unwilling to put in the
> time.
>
> Again, this was a
while ago and things change, I should PostgreSQL give it
> another
shot.
>
>
>
> Bishmer Sekaran wrote:
>
Postgres' difficulty is somewhat overstated. IMO it's easier to get
started
> with postgres than to say, learn mod_perl on Apache or configure
sendmail.
> Steps for Mark to switch to postgres:
>
> 1)
Acquire and start postgres - Easy in SUSE, they even have a page for
> it:
http://en.opensuse.org/Postgresql
>
> 2) Export data from Access
(Access->Excel->csv is easiest? Seems like it's
> more convoluted,
ie would be faster than Access-> csv since this is M$ we're
> talking
about)
>
> 3) Create his new db - Copy the same format as
previously, just in ANSI SQL.
> Probably something like
>
>
CREATE TABLE Records (
> Artist text,
> Album text,
> Year
integer,
> Genre text,
> Rating integer,
> Lastquality
datatype
> );
>
> 4) COPY Records FROM filename WITH
CSV;
> See also:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/sql-copy.html
>
> Bryan
O'Neal wrote:
>> I don't think any one doubts postgresqls ability to
run his db
>> effectively, instead we doubt its ease of use. MS Access
it is not ;)
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing
list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or to change your mail settings:
>
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss