OK,
[0] hard time,
times
[1] "not reading"
is -- "so far" -- a double negative.
I have no problem (ain't got no un-problem) with lots
of negatives, but I just think you meant the meaning,
that goes with an EVEN number of them here.
So, I think it should be
> with a grain of salt.
instead of
[2] without a grain of salt.
because IMHO, [2] makes it a triple negative which -- has
the meaning 180 degrees from what it should be.
Don't get me wrong -- a quadruple negative would be fine here.
Just not an "ODD" number of negatives, since that has
the meaning off by a "power of minus one"
from what it should be.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Ryan Rix
<phrkonaleash@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
The **ONLY** source of said leak so far has been one Micheal Geist, with
absolutely no other sources. EVERYTHING links back to him. As such I have a
very hard time not reading this without a grain of salt.
Ryan
Ryan Rix
Fedora KDE SIG Member, Phoenix AZ Ambassador, News KDE Beat Writer
Please refrain from mailing me directly in replies, I am subsribing
via GMane NNTP. Thank you.
http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://identi.ca/phrkonaleash
XMPP: phrkonaleash@gmail.com | MSN: phrkonaleash@yahoo.com
AIM: phrkonaleash | Yahoo: phrkonaleash
IRC: PhrkOnLsh@irc.freenode.net/#srcedit,#plugaz,#fedora-kde and
countless other FOSS channels.