On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 17:46, Lisa Kachold <lisakachold@obnosis.com> wrote:


On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:22 PM, JD Austin <jd@twingeckos.com> wrote:
Rhino does make good hardware.
Another local vendor is Xorcom; while their parent company is based in Israel XorcomUSA is based in Phoenix.
The only thing I like about Xorcom hardware over Rhino is that it scales a little easier.  It is USB2 based so you don't have to worry about whether the motherboard is compatible with PCI cards (3v/5v), you can fit a lot of telephony hardware in a small amount of space (for example this install: http://picasaweb.google.com/twingeckos/FortPolkJointReadinessTrainingCenter#), and it generally comes out at a slightly lower price for the customer (sometimes significantly less).  
That said... I don't care for the XR1000 server that Xorcom sells as it is too underpowered to expand (ok for demos) but the XR2000 and XR3000 servers are fine; they will be coming out with a more powerful XR1000 soon thankfully.  

Yes, I agree!

voip-info.org is a one stop reference for all things Asterisk, BTW.
 

Sangoma also makes fine Asterisk telephony hardware.  I haven't tried any of the Chinese Digium knockoffs and probably never will.  I don't recommend mixing different vendor's Asterisk telephony hardware as it is very un-likely that the combination has been tested by either vendor.  
For 'roll your own' servers I recommend Server Micro hardware.

I agree, provided the cards are installed right (PCI conflicts); if you are using Digium or Rhino cards.  I have not used the Xorcom USB2 stuff.

Since the phones are what users actually touch get good phones :)  For phones I generally prefer Polycom or Aastra phones.  You can use Cisco phones if you flash them with the SIP firmware (there is chan_skinny for Asterisk but why complicate matters); you may have to set qualify=no to avoid registration issues.  

I don't see any benefit using Cisco phones over Polycom?  It's nice to have a well supported firmware also. 

I agree!  I've had a clients demand Cisco phones because it was 'what they knew they liked'.  It was a trial by fire the first time to figure out how to make them work (registration and other issues at first) and I had to roll my own directory code but that wasn't that hard. 

Polycom makes great phones and so does Aastra.  The main reason I like Aastra over Polycom isn't that their phones are better (they're on par with Polycom phones) but that they're much more asterisk savvy and way more approachable (I'm nobody and I have the direct line to the Western Regional sales manager).  Aastra phones even have a default mode where the phone asks you for it's extension number and password and it seeks out the PBX server (pretty neat) and a nice XML interface to make them do neat tricks.  Polycoms have an XML interface that you can drive from the server also.  NetXUSA does a pretty good job of supporting Polycom on Asterisk here though.