Yeah, no doubt. He wouldn't stick up for his buddy? The guy he supports? Or because of legal reasons?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnPI7B7ZS9M

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13151889

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2013/01/24/what-mark-zuckerberg-and-chris-christie-have-in-common

On Friday, June 07, 2013 03:31:05 PM Eric Cope wrote:

its also [almost] word for word the same as Zuckerbergs.

on a similar note, its not far fetched that they would be legally required to deny access, like an NSL...

I think 3rd party auditors would calm fears too.

Eric

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Stephen <cryptworks@gmail.com> wrote:

Another snip, this is actually an interesting response given out conversation

and thanks for the link on burnerphone. that is indeed interesting.

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss