Trent Shipley wrote:
> No. This is essentially a content analysis problem. The idea is to mark up
> *meaning* not structure or format. In a sense the idea is to press XML |
> SGML into service as a semantic content markup language. The problem with
> your break idea is that it:
You should check out the W3C's Semantic Web rantings then.
Regarding your example and SGML. I think except for the attributes in
the close tags, that format is SGML compliant.
--
Tom Bradford --- The dbXML Project ---
http://www.dbxml.org/
We store your XML data a hell of a lot better than /dev/null
(text/plain)
