Alan Dayley wrote:
>
> This has evidently been resolved with a minor change in the RTLinux license:
>
> http://slashdot.org/yro/01/09/17/2056231.shtml
I must say that the info about RTLinux has been inlightening... It is
likely I will not be able to use it for my families business (depending
on certain changes to the copyright)...
But something really bothered me. In their reply timothy (whoever)
refrences the original post as such:
"Anonymous Coward writes..." and "crimoid points to ZDNet coverage..."
I'm not even sure how to respond to this. Sound like tim is mean
spirited and rude to say the least. Is this what slashdot.org has come
to? attacking anyone posting anonymously?
EBo --
(text/plain)
