Re: No mo Docker for macOS!

Etusivu
Liitteet:
Viesti alkuperäisessä muodossaan
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
+ (text/plain)
Poista viesti
Vastaa
Lähettäjä: Thomas Scott via PLUG-discuss
Päiväys:  
Vastaanottaja: Main PLUG discussion list
Kopio: Thomas Scott
Aihe: Re: No mo Docker for macOS!
Unfortunately, this is the last OS release for intel based Macs period.

I have had two M-series MBPs at work and bought a M-series Mac mini for
home use. I also have a small k3s cluster for a homelab, if I could swap
out my mini PCs for native k3s/k8s on macOS, I'd consider it. Granted I
paid about 1.5 x what I did for my nodes and they have 32GB and 20 cores,
and the RAM maxes out at 96 GB and *I can swap it myself*... so, I lose all
of that, but if you could find enough used with maxed out specs, it's not a
bad place to be.

Best Regards,
-Thomas Scott


On Jun 12, 2025 at 1:59:59 AM, David Schwartz via PLUG-discuss <
> wrote:

> Interesting question.
>
> There are still plenty of Intel-based Macs available that will be able to
> run this new version of macOS.
>
> But I think this is aimed at people building stuff in php, python, and
> other languages that are not CPU-dependent.
>
> Otherwise it would just be competing with Parallels, right?
>
> As an aside, I hear Parallels running X86 apps using Rosetta on an
> M-series CPU isn’t very fast. I wonder how it will compare to this new
> approach running on an Intel-based Mac MIni or MBP?
>
> There were MBPs that shipped with i9’s in them; the Mac Minis maxed-out at
> 4-core i7’s.
>
> My 2018 Mac MIni (i7) is fast enough for my needs, but it’s having heat
> problems, and slows down as it gets hotter. I’m thinking of replacing it.
>
> -David Schwartz
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 11, 2025, at 8:28 PM, James Dugger <> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I heard about that. The question I have is can you package images
> for x86 architecture without Docker Buildx/QEMU with Mac's on Apple
> silicone . Mac's Rosetta 2 is supposed to be able to do it. But Idk. Most
> use cases for Linux containers in the cloud need to be packaged for x86.
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 1:46 AM David Schwartz via PLUG-discuss <
> > wrote:
>
>> Well, if you’re open to a reason to switch to a Mac, this might nudge you
>> a little bit:
>>
>> macOS 26 adds native support for Linux containers
>>
>>
>> https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/06/09/sorry-docker-macos-26-adds-native-support-for-linux-containers
>>
>> -David Schwartz
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> PLUG-discuss mailing list:
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>
>
>
> --
> James
>
> *Linkedin <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/james-h-dugger/15/64b/74a/>*
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list:
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list:
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss